[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xml-dev
Subject:    #x3000 inconsistency in June XML Syntax spec?
From:       Eric Baatz - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS <ebaatz () barbaresco ! East ! Sun ! COM>
Date:       1997-07-10 19:03:29
Message-ID: libSDtMail.199707101503.31861.ebaatz () barbaresco
[Download RAW message or body]

One of the difference between the April and June specs was the
removal of #x3000 from

  [1] S ::= (#x20 | #x9 | #xd |#xa)+
  
However, it still survives in

  [14] PubidChar ::= #x20 | #x9 | #xd |#xa | #x3000 | [a-zA-Z0-9] ...
  
Should it be removed from [14] for consistency?


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]