[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xml-cocoon-dev
Subject:    Re: From Woody to CocoonForms
From:       Andreas Hochsteger <e9625392 () student ! tuwien ! ac ! at>
Date:       2004-03-05 22:12:15
Message-ID: 4048FB3F.3010801 () student ! tuwien ! ac ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

I thought about the same like you, Ugo.

But Tim has a very valid point here:
Try searching goolge for 'forms' and then for 'cforms'

Ugo Cei wrote:
> Marc Portier wrote:
> 
>> another +1 to 'cforms' over 'forms'
> 
> 
> Doesn't the "c" stand for "Cocoon"? If it does, I find it somewhat 
> redundant, especially in a package name: org.apache.cocoon.forms == 
> org.apache.cocoon.cocoon.forms?
> 
> And what if someday we develop a new forms framework, do we call it 
> "dforms"? ;-)
> 
> I propose to use just "forms" as the block name, "Cocoon Forms" in the 
> docs, and do a s/woody/forms/ in the package names and namespaces.
> 
> Just MHO,
> 
>     Ugo
> 
> 
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]