[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xml-cocoon-dev
Subject:    RE: [ANN] XMLForm as a standalone servlet toolkit
From:       "Artur Bialecki" <artur () digitalfairway ! com>
Date:       2003-03-31 21:11:24
[Download RAW message or body]


Hello all,

I would like to see an official replay to Kevin's questions.

Thanks,

Artur...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:news@main.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Kevin O'Neill
> 
> I understand your point and agree with it. I would like to however ask
> some follow up questions :).
> 
> Say I'm building with cocoon 2.0.4 and there is a bug in the 
> foo. I fix 
> that bug in the version of coccon that I supply to my client. 
> Under normal
> circumstances I would supply the client with the code (including third
> party code, patched or not) of the product I'm working on. 
> Can I supply
> the patched version?
> 
> Now lets say that I enhance one of the existing components to 
> extend the
> functionality in some way of the component (say allow for an addition
> configuration option). Can I supply this version?
> 
> What if I've submitted both enhancements as patches and they have been
> excepted for the HEAD version?
> 
> What if they haven't?
> 
> > But defining an package and import it (or extend it) are 
> two entirely
> > different things because they can't do any harm.
> 
> I think this sort of stuff should be in a licensing FAQ.
> 
> > Stefano.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]