[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xine-user
Subject:    [xine-user] why does xshm look better then Xv?
From:       Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore () gmx ! de>
Date:       2007-02-07 0:01:49
Message-ID: 200702070101.50461.Dexter.Filmore () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

I just stumbled across this:

I use ATI fglrx 8.31 I just ran two instances of xine, so one uses the 
fglrx-Xv-Overlay, one uses Xshm.

What can I say, Xshm looks better. Edges smoother.

Next funny thing: taking screenshots with xine they look exactly the same, 
pixel by pixel. 

Now - if the screenshots look alike, why not the live video?

Confused,

Dex


-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C++++ UL++ P+>++ L+++>++++ E-- W++ N o? K-
w--(---) !O M+ V- PS+ PE Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(++) tv--(+)@ 
b++(+++) DI+++ D- G++ e* h>++ r* y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

http://www.stop1984.com
http://www.againsttcpa.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
xine-user mailing list
xine-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xine-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]