[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xindice-users
Subject:    Re: Xpath query in xindice 1.1b1
From:       "Julien Le Dem" <julien.ledem () thet-is ! com>
Date:       2003-11-10 17:40:31
[Download RAW message or body]

Thank you,
So the problem comes from the JDK 1.4.2 that has its own version of the
parser in it and I should endorse something to have it working (the version
of Xalan distributed with Xindice 1.1b1 is 2.4.0).
I looked in the Xalan 2.4.0 source code and the method returns an Array !!!
So you're completely right :-) .
Is there another way than endorsing ? Because I use Xindice embeded and I
have other parts of my app that parse XML... Of course I can upgrade to the
CVS version...
Julien
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry Rosenbaum" <Terry@amicas.com>
To: <xindice-users@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: Xpath query in xindice 1.1b1


> Nothing broken. Ensure that you use the correct
> version of Xalan depending on the version of
> Xindice you're using. Use late-model versions
> of Xalan with late-model versions of Xindice
> and you'll see it work OK.
>
> The Xalan API changed and the Xindice code
> was changed to match that change.
>
> I use the latest CVS code for Xindice and
> use Xalan 2.5.D1 and it works for me.
>
> -Terry
>
> Julien Le Dem wrote:
>
> >So this is a bug in 1.1B1 (I mean, there's no way to have this working in
> >1.1b1)
> >A question that maybe of no use :
> >If the method was returning an array before, why Xalan dev don't leave it
> >with a @deprecated info ? I know it's ugly, but it prevents other
projects
> >(like Xindice) to have bug in it.
> >Lazy me that wanted to use a pre-packaged jar ... I will have to build it
> >from CVS... :°-(
> >Is there any stability issue in CVS version that wasn't in the 1.1b1
> >"Milestone Release"?
> >I'm using very basic (but great ! don't be alarmed devs! ;-)
> >functionnalities like adding/replacing documents in collections and
> >performing XPath requests.
> >Thanks, Julien
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "JC Tchitchiama" <jct@panonet.net>
> >To: <xindice-users@xml.apache.org>; "Julien Le Dem"
> ><julien.ledem@thet-is.com>
> >Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 3:44 PM
> >Subject: Re: Xpath query in xindice 1.1b1
> >
> >
> >Hi Julien,
> >
> >When I came accross the problem I just decided to use the CVS version
> >which has something lile
> >
> >...
> >code snippet
> >      private Object evalFunction(String owner, int pos) throws Exception
{
> >         int idx = Compiler.getFirstChildPos(pos);
> >         int id = cmp.getOp(idx);
> >         int endFunc = cmp.getOp(pos +1) - 1;
> >
> >         List args = new ArrayList();
> >         int lp = idx+1;
> >         while ( lp < endFunc ) {
> >            args.add(evaluate(owner, lp));
> >            lp = cmp.getNextOpPos(lp);
> >         }
> >...
> >
> >Indeed the XPath Compiler interface has changes
> >
> >On Monday 10 Nov 2003 1:34 pm, Julien Le Dem wrote:
> >
> >
> >><problem>
> >>When sending an xpath request using a function (like count(...) ) I have
> >>
> >>
> >an
> >
> >
> >>exception.
> >></problem>
> >><Context>
> >>package org.apache.xindice.core.query
> >>class XPathQueryResolver
> >><snip line="539">
> >>      private Object evalFunction(String owner, int pos) throws
Exception
> >>
> >>
> >{
> >
> >
> >>         int idx = cmp.getFirstChildPos(pos);
> >>         int id = cmp.getOp(idx);
> >>         int endFunc = pos + cmp.getOpMap()[pos+1] - 1;
> >></snip>
> >>the last line throws a NoSuchMethodError.
> >>after looking the Xalan javadoc getOpMap() doesn't return an array.
> >>I looked into CVS the current version and the code has changed (a bug
fix
> >>?) so it shouldn't throw an exception anymore (but I haven't tested it)
I
> >>use xindice in embeded mode.
> >></context>
> >><question>
> >>What should I do ?
> >>1) Do I use the wrong Xalan version ? Xindice 1.1b1 should use an older
> >>version and I have to use endorse something ?
> >>2) Do I have to update my Xindice library to the actual CVS ?
> >></question>
> >>thanks Julien
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]