[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: xfree86-forum
Subject: RE: [forum] XFree86 modularization
From: Charles Goodwin <charles.goodwin () credit1 ! co ! uk>
Date: 2003-05-09 16:46:38
[Download RAW message or body]
> Personally, I see every patch that goes into the XFree86 version
> of FreeType that isn't upstream as an argument in the *other*
> direction.
Agreed.
Either you go with Freetype or you fork it and name it differently. You
can't have 2 things named the same and releasing differently. Well, you
can, but it's not right.
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [forum] XFree86 modularization</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> Personally, I see every patch that goes into the XFree86 \
version</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> of FreeType that isn't upstream as an argument \
in the *other*</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> direction.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Agreed.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Either you go with Freetype or you fork it and name it \
differently. You can't have 2 things named the same and releasing \
differently. Well, you can, but it's not right.</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic