[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       woden-dev
Subject:    [jira] [Created] (WSS-645) using WSS4j to genrate WS-SecurityPolicy without CXF
From:       "Frank Henningsen (JIRA)" <jira () apache ! org>
Date:       2019-03-07 13:07:00
Message-ID: JIRA.13220194.1551963982000.10841.1551964020114 () Atlassian ! JIRA
[Download RAW message or body]

Frank Henningsen created WSS-645:
------------------------------------

             Summary: using WSS4j to genrate WS-SecurityPolicy without CXF
                 Key: WSS-645
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-645
             Project: WSS4J
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: WSS4J Core
    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
            Reporter: Frank Henningsen
            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
         Attachments: skat-b2b-x509-policy.xml

Dear Team WSS4J

i have a task to sign and encrypt webservices that use a WS-SecurityPolicy =
(see attachmant) in a SAP environment where sending/receiving SOAP request =
is not part of the solution, i only need to transform/decorate the SOAP req=
uests with WSS for webservices that use a WS-SecurityPolicy. I would have l=
iked to create a solution that given a WS-SecurityPolicy could use WSS4J to=
 generate the appropriate WSS header and body, but for reasons i dont under=
stand this is only possible using CXF.

CXF use PolicyOutInterceptor (see [http://cxf.apache.org/using-ws-policy-in=
-cxf-projects)]=C2=A0to=C2=A0decorate SOAP requests.=C2=A0

To me it seems strange that WSS4J has implemented the WS-SecurityPolicy sup=
port in another framework (CXF) so i propose that the WS-SecurityPolicy imp=
lementation also should be supported by the core WSS4J core :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]