[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wireshark-users
Subject:    Re: [Wireshark-users] SEQ/ACK analysis
From:       "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-10-26 7:48:26
Message-ID: c9a3e4540610260048g4ecfaf36l4cb96e5a80c6b3ae () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

should be in the release branch now

On 10/14/06, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@loplof.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:03:53AM +0000, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> > The field for showing how long it took to ACK a datasegment was "lost"
> > a while ago when i did a quite nessecary rewrite of the seq/ack
> > analysis code to clean it up.
> > (it was "lost" because i thought it was not one of the fundamentally
> > important fields   and i forgot to add it back.)
> >
> > Ill try to look into adding it back together with a field that tells
> > which packet it acks data for.
> > I wont have time to do so today or tomorrow so please, if this field
> > is important to you, keep pinging me every once in a while and ill add
> > it back when priorities allow.
>
> Will it make it into 0.99.4 or should it be noted in the known bugs
> section?
>
>  ciao
>       Joerg
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@loplof.de>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]