[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wireshark-dev
Subject:    Re: [Wireshark-dev] switch statement in proto_register
From:       Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all ! nl>
Date:       2009-09-29 5:18:56
Message-ID: 4AC198C0.2050006 () xs4all ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

See packet-m2pa.c for an example.

Thanx,
Jaap

Cole, Richard L. (MSFC-ES53)[MTSI] wrote:
> What is the preferred method for supporting multiple versions of a protocol within \
> a dissector? I have setup a protocol preference and was using that in a switch \
> statement structure but the proto_register function doesn't seem to like the switch \
> statement. Dissect_ doesn't might the switch statement and that part seems to be \
> working but the dissector complains with the switch statement in proto_register. 
> Ideas? Thoughts?
> 
> Thank you

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]