[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: wireshark-bugs
Subject: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16287] EVPN Layer 2 Attributes Extended Community (RFC 8214) not decoded
From: bugzilla-daemon () wireshark ! org
Date: 2019-12-24 12:16:16
Message-ID: bug-16287-15-n3YSGjOpCk () https ! bugs ! wireshark ! org/bugzilla/
[Download RAW message or body]
--15771897770.b24cB49.4579
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:16:16 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16287
--- Comment #3 from Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xs4all.nl> ---
Krzysztof,
In the 13th UPDATE message it seems there is an extra flag bit being used,
which, according to RFC8214, should be zero. According to which draft should
these be dissected? Would that be draft-yu-bess-evpn-l2-attributes-04? What do
you expect?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
--15771897770.b24cB49.4579
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:16:17 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/" />
<style>
body, th, td {
font-size: 12px;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; }
p, pre { margin-top: 1em; }
pre {
font-family: Bitstream Vera Sans Mono, Consolas, Lucida Console, \
monospace; white-space: pre-wrap;
}
table { border: 0; border-spacing: 0; border-collapse: collapse; }
th, td {
padding: 0.25em;
padding-left: 0.5em;
padding-right: 0.5em;
}
th { background: rgb(240, 240, 240); }
th.th_top { border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(116, 126, 147); }
th.th_left { border-right: 1px solid rgb(116, 126, 147); }
td.removed { background-color: #ffcccc; }
td.added { background-color: #e4ffc7; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_IN_PROGRESS "
title="IN_PROGRESS - EVPN Layer 2 Attributes Extended Community (RFC 8214) not \
decoded" href="https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16287#c3">Comment \
# 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_IN_PROGRESS "
title="IN_PROGRESS - EVPN Layer 2 Attributes Extended Community (RFC 8214) not \
decoded" href="https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16287">bug \
16287</a> from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" \
href="mailto:jaap.keuter@xs4all.nl" title="Jaap Keuter \
<jaap.keuter@xs4all.nl>"> <span class="fn">Jaap Keuter</span></a> \
</span></b> <pre>Krzysztof,
In the 13th UPDATE message it seems there is an extra flag bit being used,
which, according to RFC8214, should be zero. According to which draft should
these be dissected? Would that be draft-yu-bess-evpn-l2-attributes-04? What do
you expect?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
--15771897770.b24cB49.4579--
[Attachment #3 (text/plain)]
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic