[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: wireshark-bugs
Subject: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13823] OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 is considered as unknown
From: bugzilla-daemon () wireshark ! org
Date: 2017-06-30 19:36:13
Message-ID: bug-13823-15-lEpRYx3NRj () https ! bugs ! wireshark ! org/bugzilla/
[Download RAW message or body]
--14988513732.EbD1.4294
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:36:13 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13823
--- Comment #26 from Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl> ---
(In reply to Alexander Okonnikov from comment #25)
> Nevertheless we could decode Opaque Information content, based on format of
> TLV structure, which is the same for any TLV - standard or vendor-specific.
In theory that is indeed the case, but in practice we can observe contents with
invalid TLVs (the capture you provided) ;) Can you check if the proposed patch
is valid?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
--14988513732.EbD1.4294
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:36:13 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/" />
<style>
body, th, td {
font-size: 12px;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; }
p, pre { margin-top: 1em; }
pre {
font-family: Bitstream Vera Sans Mono, Consolas, Lucida Console, \
monospace; white-space: pre-wrap;
}
table { border: 0; border-spacing: 0; border-collapse: collapse; }
th, td {
padding: 0.25em;
padding-left: 0.5em;
padding-right: 0.5em;
}
th { background: rgb(240, 240, 240); }
th.th_top { border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(116, 126, 147); }
th.th_left { border-right: 1px solid rgb(116, 126, 147); }
td.removed { background-color: #ffcccc; }
td.added { background-color: #e4ffc7; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_CONFIRMED "
title="CONFIRMED - OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 is considered as unknown"
href="https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13823#c26">Comment # \
26</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_CONFIRMED "
title="CONFIRMED - OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 is considered as unknown"
href="https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13823">bug 13823</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" \
href="mailto:peter@lekensteyn.nl" title="Peter Wu \
<peter@lekensteyn.nl>"> <span class="fn">Peter Wu</span></a> </span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Alexander Okonnikov from <a \
href="show_bug.cgi?id=13823#c25">comment #25</a>) <span class="quote">> \
Nevertheless we could decode Opaque Information content, based on format of > TLV \
structure, which is the same for any TLV - standard or vendor-specific.</span >
In theory that is indeed the case, but in practice we can observe contents with
invalid TLVs (the capture you provided) ;) Can you check if the proposed patch
is valid?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
--14988513732.EbD1.4294--
[Attachment #3 (text/plain)]
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic