[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wink-dev
Subject:    Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1.1 (RC1)
From:       Bryant Luk <bryant.luk () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-06-25 18:07:42
Message-ID: AANLkTikCxG5MlJnUccVUtW5jSZaax2OOytv9x_tgDwe4 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I made the changes to the LICENSE headers and changed the
maven-license-plugin in the root pom.xml to not exclude pom.xmls.  All
files listed on the exclusion list (to my knowledge) either a) really
do have the LICENSE header but don't have a file extension so the
Maven plugin can't do the check (since it can't determine if it's a
plain text file comment needed or an XML comment needed), b) are
binary files, or c) cannot have the LICENSE header.

I think this solves the LICENSE header issues Kevan ran into.  If
anyone encounters an error building, please send an e-mail.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Bryant Luk <bryant.luk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll fix up some of the warnings as well.  Need a few.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jesse A Ramos <jramos@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Thanks, Kevin, for pointing out these issues.  I'll look into them today.
> > 
> > -- Jesse
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:
> > Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> > To:
> > wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date:
> > 06/24/2010 10:26 PM
> > Subject:
> > Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1.1 (RC1)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > A couple of problems.
> > 
> > First, wink-itests/wink-itest/wink-itest-contentencode/pom.xml needs an
> > apache source license header. There are some number of additional files
> > without a license header. They appear to be trivial, machine generated, or
> > syntactically problematic to include a license header.
> > 
> > Next, there's something wrong with the checksums. I spot checked several
> > files. For example
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-003/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1.1-incubating/apache-wink-1.1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >  
> > 
> > The signature looks ok, but all of the checksums were bad (same for
> > apache-wink-1.1.1-incubating.zip...
> > 
> > 2e6620ec280aa808915cc1f7c7bb692e126ba72b
> > apache-wink-1.1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> > 949be5a28efc55eab93d3d79de49874b00667415
> > 
> > 8c09087c954638444245a8127c3dc3fa
> > apache-wink-1.1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> > 590752ae0e311f4230f315f5111b448a
> > 
> > 66100abe60f2dcda9dfc246f38190a3f63d9e5eb
> > apache-wink-1.1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > 6a2609297db89addf13b1ae8e53830644479766b
> > 
> > 6d224c05dc417b5c0aa47896cfc860fb  apache-wink-1.1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > d2d27d70eb6e3565e1f6d9ed95b04812
> > 
> > These problems need to be fixed. Here's my -1
> > 
> > --kevan
> > 
> > 
> > On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Jesse A Ramos wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I apologize for the delay.  Had a few issues to work though.
> > > 
> > > Now that everything is resolved, I'm calling a vote to release Wink
> > 1.1.1
> > > (RC1)
> > > 
> > > The Maven staging area is at:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-003/
> > > 
> > > The distributions are in:
> > > 
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-003/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1.1-incubating/
> >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This release is tagged at:
> > > 
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1.1-incubating/
> > 
> > > 
> > > (revision 956599)
> > > 
> > > The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours.
> > > 
> > > Guide to testing staged releases:
> > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
> > > 
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1
> > > 
> > > -- Jesse Ramos
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]