[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wink-dev
Subject:    Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
From:       Bryant Luk <bryant.luk () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-04-30 17:46:23
Message-ID: l2td5d04a31004301046oe0921a8bh6afdb7bb7ef7f99c () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Got a few different test machines running on different JDKs.  I fixed
a few issues there
(i.e. missing JAXB) including the request test.  I didn't see any runtime
issues.

Looked at the Aries thread for their vote and the message on
legal-discuss.  I don't see an agreement on what absolutely needs to
be done but I'm guessing we go grab the entire "dual license" license,
append it to the LICENSE and say that the StaX and JAXB are licensed
under that (and we choose CDDL), then add a line in the NOTICE that
says we distribute the JAXB under CDDL.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Bryant Luk <bryant.luk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
> 
> The normal wink-itest pass for me.  It may be due to a bug in the test
> case.  From the test history it seems this one was modified to check
> the server time in case the server and client are not in sync (i.e.
> time zone or not within the right times).
> 
> Just FYI, the wink-itest-osgi need some work in order to get that
> working.  WINK-269 needs to be resolved so that the API JAR will pick
> Wink as the implementation to use.  I've been recently thinking we can
> just add a BundleActivator and call the RuntimeDelegate.setInstance.
> I think that's outside the scope of this release though for now and
> would rather tackle that feature after some discussion.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm seeing test failures. Am I the only one?
> > 
> > $ mvn -DassemblyId=tomcat install
> > 
> > led to multiple failure like the following:
> > 
> > Test set: org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Tests run: 10, Failures: 6, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.253 sec <<< \
> > FAILURE! testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest) \
> >                 Time elapsed: 0.014 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: null expected:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[S]T> \
> > but was:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[D]T> at \
> > junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81) at \
> > junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87) at \
> > org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.checkIfModifiedSinceUsingSuppliedDateFormat(RequestMethodsTest.java:184)
> >  at org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(RequestMethodsTest.java:95)
> >  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> > at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
> > at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
> > at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> > at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> > at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> > at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
> > at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
> > at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
> > at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:81)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
> >  at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127)
> >  at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:345)
> >  at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1009)
> >  
> > --kevan
> > 
> > On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
> > > 
> > > The Maven staging area is at:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
> > > 
> > > The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
> > >  
> > > This release is tagged at:
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
> > > (revision 938237)
> > > 
> > > The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> > > 4:30pm US CST).
> > > 
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1
> > 
> > 
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]