[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: user32/tests: Add additional test for window station name.
From:       Alexandre Julliard <julliard () winehq ! org>
Date:       2016-04-29 10:56:26
Message-ID: 878tzwn0o5.fsf () winehq ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@fds-team.de> writes:

> Before I resend, may I ask why this patch is pending? If its because of the hardcoded "0x0",
> I can change that of course. The main point is to show that window stations without a name
> get assigned one by the operating system. Applications depend on this when they "manually"
> implement window station inheritance (query name and later pass it to CreateProcess).

Sorry, I wanted to look more into this behavior, but haven't found the
time yet. But the test is fine, I should have applied it.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic