[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: wine-devel
Subject: Re: user32/tests: Add additional test for window station name.
From: Alexandre Julliard <julliard () winehq ! org>
Date: 2016-04-29 10:56:26
Message-ID: 878tzwn0o5.fsf () winehq ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@fds-team.de> writes:
> Before I resend, may I ask why this patch is pending? If its because of the hardcoded "0x0",
> I can change that of course. The main point is to show that window stations without a name
> get assigned one by the operating system. Applications depend on this when they "manually"
> implement window station inheritance (query name and later pass it to CreateProcess).
Sorry, I wanted to look more into this behavior, but haven't found the
time yet. But the test is fine, I should have applied it.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic