[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: wine-devel
Subject: RE: Out-of-date gcc and ld on the testbot build VM
From: Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmaster () outlook ! com>
Date: 2015-12-28 11:29:31
Message-ID: BLU171-W32B0A26F879B38D618D776F2FB0 () phx ! gbl
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Monday, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:03 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Hugh McMaster wrote:
>
> > > > The testbot seems to have an out-of-date version of mingw32, or at least, its \
> > > > linker, ld.exe.
> > > > I'm trying to run tests for GetConsoleScreenBufferInfoEx, a function \
> > > > available on Vista and higher.
> > >
> > > Then using GetProcAddress() is the only solution.
> >
> > Yes. Until the build software can be updated.
>
> Since the tests must be executed under versions of Windows earlier than
> Vista it's still needed to fallback to GetProcAddress().
For the submitted tests, yes, I am doing that.
But for quick testing, it would be nice if GetModuleHandle() and GetProcAddress() \
weren't required. Calling documented Vista functions like \
GetConsoleScreenBufferInfoEx really shouldn't require special handling.
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>On Monday, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:03 +0800, Dmitry \
Timoshkov wrote:<br><div>> Hugh McMaster wrote:<br>> <br>> > >> The \
testbot seems to have an out-of-date version of mingw32, or at least, its linker, \
ld.exe.<br>> > >><br>> > >> I'm trying to run tests for \
GetConsoleScreenBufferInfoEx, a function available on Vista and higher.<br>> > \
><br>> > > Then using GetProcAddress() is the only solution.<br>> > \
<br>> > Yes. Until the build software can be updated.<br>> <br>> Since \
the tests must be executed under versions of Windows earlier than<br>> Vista it's \
still needed to fallback to GetProcAddress().<br><br>For the submitted tests, yes, I \
am doing that.<br><br>But for quick testing, it would be nice if GetModuleHandle() \
and GetProcAddress() weren't required.<br>Calling documented Vista functions like \
GetConsoleScreenBufferInfoEx really shouldn't require special handling.<br></div> \
</div></body> </html>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic