[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: How WINE implements BitBlt function?
From:       Stefan_Dösinger <stefandoesinger () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-01-31 10:19:00
Message-ID: BFA27A41-7F50-4199-B781-C3E2C4E47ECF () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am 31.01.2015 um 08:11 schrieb John Found <johnfound@asm32.info>:
> So, the question: How in WINE is implemented BitBlt function in order =
to have so high performance and so low CPU load?
We use the X render extension. See dlls/winex11.drv/xrender.c.

(I am not an expert on the GDI parts of Wine, so no guarantee for =
correctness of this information. I haven't followed the full path from =
gdi's BitBlt to the final X11 call)


["signature.asc" (signature.asc)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUzKwUAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMw28cP/i4D4YxygQCxtTviXRZu0G1I
4D+jLpHiV5T+Iv7rTquxu9Le7n74RSaTbONwPVC/f1el4wE8zDeUcIrQtef2+bJO
vTjowuY73qTp4Ad8wCurbxWhZ1141XR+P7GCWL6zePW7djoA2m4kCiM1Nj+qfABC
iSbgfZ+4TgubMyRugzljIoJQg2XI8vSUEoH4viPL1fpHnR5Nu/s4DguuXvZMICun
QYfJe5crChRLkx9w2DJbFZVlcksMrbfo2p71/zFVThPctnA+KUSGuYF8lHVaCbRo
KwilzWw1ApiRitsv88kNkzdM/h8Kqh0TLPmvpNF3RhHtJVhvyN1p4DbxyBCkA9Im
COQ8i/3j4cT0A2TVS0NSVjv7rKEa0EA3EoMR8lqG+yE2SdATUDg4cLWFRhEGR1Ja
slCAeEGJm/HojxUszIfoj79YPmVO3OUvLeR2tmiveOUg7eQBPYap/PipDpszEaT3
Sk6ePP51jiyR+HojVa3hACWmiydTWq+4tE9bOp/7nR5Wxu1C9Q8bK4OCSjs16saJ
l9bBQguwbnXgyuuZ3L9385BK7VQ9x7wixuAkw4dXn3PKIylB9PKFFVTpxE4kkANr
lCQpAXtoABN+7o5eSwfFTft0FJrA4aV2GVH51PFP3eBMbF41bXxZUbLssFtcd819
elSlJMTCNvj0QsQWQVj1
=ynf2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic