[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: kernel32/tests: remove win9x hacks (try 2)
From:       James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-02-26 19:53:07
Message-ID: 4D695A23.2020108 () earthlink ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2/25/11 10:33 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Saulius Krasuckas<saulius2@ar.fi.lt>  writes:
>
>> Thanks.  Do you mean something like integrating OpenWatcom C compiler
>> optionally into dlls/*/tests?
>>
>> And then running 16-bit part of winetest on Win3.1?  WinXP seems to be
>> broken in my case.  While Win98 seems OK.
> No, winetest would run on XP. If your app doesn't work on XP then it's
> unlikely to work on Wine. We are *not* going to replicate the Win95
> 16-bit architecture.
I've been looking at the use of is_win9x and all the tests do for 
riched20 (except one) is check for the presence of UNICODE calls, namely 
lstrcmpW.  I would like to rename the variable and redo the test.  Is 
this acceptable or should the test itself be dropped?

James McKenzie



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]