[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: shdocvw(2/2): ignore VT_ERROR arguments to WebBrowser_Navigate2
From:       Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani () redhat ! com>
Date:       2006-09-29 22:30:17
Message-ID: 451D9E79.9010000 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Juan Lang wrote:
>>Ignoring VT_ERROR just masks a previous error.
> 
> 
> Hm.. are you sure?  These are input arguments, not results.  This isn't
You can never be sure with this OLE stuff. My only experience with
VT_ERROR stems from variant arithmetics and those functions didn't like
VT_ERROR as input. Well except VarCmp when both input variants where
VT_ERROR it would return "equal".

> the only app that gets further with this patch.  See also bug 6166.
> 
> I guess a test case is the only answer.
Definitely.

bye
	michael
-- 
Michael Stefaniuc               Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
Sr. Network Engineer            Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH                    Email: mstefani@redhat.com
Hauptstaetterstr. 58            http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]