[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: server: Add object type to struct object
From:       Vitaliy Margolen <wine-devel () kievinfo ! com>
Date:       2005-10-31 5:14:25
Message-ID: 458177184.20051030221425 () kievinfo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Sunday, October 30, 2005, 9:52:40 PM, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:

>>This is by far not what native does. But we are not implementing the whole
>>kernel here. So having just an object type ID will work just fine for what
>>we need.
>>
>>Vitaliy Margolen
>>
>>changelog:
>>  server
>>  - Add object type to struct object
>>

> Why do you need this? It seems that having an object type field is 
> redundant since we can uniquely identify an object by the address of its 
> object_ops.
Because the way I've implemented directory object it's not fully abstract. It
needs to have a special case for symlinks lookups.

Also I will need that for NtQueryDirectoryObject as it have to return object
type name. I suppose I could compare obj->ops but that means they won't be
static anymore and will have to be visible outside the file where they are
defined.

Vitaliy







[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]