[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: wine-devel
Subject: Re: Wine and locales
From: Alexandre Julliard <julliard () winehq ! org>
Date: 2004-07-30 3:56:47
Message-ID: 878yd22lmo.fsf () mail ! wine ! dyndns ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <dmitry@baikal.ru> writes:
> "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard@winehq.org> wrote:
>
>> > FindResourceA
>> > FindResourceExA
>>
>> These ones have been well tested already.
>
> I don't see the tests for them in the CVS, especially part about LANGID
> preference order.
There's no automated test, because it's a bit tricky to switch locales
under Windows since not all locales may be supported on a given
install. I can assure you that it has been tested and that the
behavior is correct (modulo UI language as mentioned already).
>> I see no reason to revert the patch. It's going to make no difference
>> for 99% of our users, and for the remaining 1% it's about as likely to
>> fix things as it is to break them.
>
> OK, in the worst case perhaps I will need to send a custom version
> of kernel32 with the patch reverted to the affected cxoffice users.
If they really have configured LC_CTYPE in a way that breaks things, I
would suggest to them to fix it instead, this way it will also fix
their Unix setup. Now, if you really know of a case where there is a
legitimate reason for someone to have an LC_CTYPE setup that breaks
Wine, then of course that would be a good argument against the patch.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic