[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: rpc_H_PL1
From:       Greg Turner <gmturner007 () ameritech ! net>
Date:       2002-10-30 22:29:14
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 30 October 2002 03:01 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Greg Turner <gmturner007@ameritech.net> writes:
> > diff -ur -x CVS -x 'bigdif*' ../wine.test/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c
> > ./dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c ---
> > ../wine.test/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c	2002-10-29
> > 12:59:02.000000000 -0600 +++ ./dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c	2002-10-29
> > 13:28:39.000000000 -0600 @@ -865,14 +865,21 @@
> >   *  Exists in win9x and winNT, but with different number of
> > arguments *  (9x version has 3 arguments, NT has 2).
> >   */
> > +#ifdef WINNT
> > +RPC_STATUS WINAPI I_RpcBindingSetAsync( RPC_BINDING_HANDLE
> > Binding, RPC_BLOCKING_FN BlockingFn) +#else
> >  RPC_STATUS WINAPI I_RpcBindingSetAsync( RPC_BINDING_HANDLE
> > Binding, RPC_BLOCKING_FN BlockingFn, unsigned long ServerTid )
> > +#endif
> >  {
>
> This can't work, we are not going to build two versions of Wine with
> different #ifdefs. We should simply decide which version we support
> (NT would probably be preferable) and get rid of the #ifdefs in the
> header.

OK, will do... I love that MS just creates new, similar API's with the 
same names as the old ones...  for a company that apparently loves 
backward compatibility more than stability, what are they thinking?

-- 
gmt

"The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people"
 --President Bill Clinton, MTV interview, 1993


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]