[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wikitech-l
Subject:    [Wikitech-l] 1.16 branched
From:       Tim Starling <tstarling () wikimedia ! org>
Date:       2010-02-22 12:42:08
Message-ID: 4B827BA0.10002 () wikimedia ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

I've created a branch for MediaWiki 1.16, and updated the version
numbers in trunk to 1.17alpha.

This does NOT mean that the 1.16 branch is stable and ready for
general use. It is still in alpha. I have created it because I was
getting tired of chasing the ever-receding target that is HEAD. Now
that we are branched, if the schedule has to slip again, it will just
mean less features, rather than more time reviewing new features.

In the current state, it will take at least a week to get 1.16
stabilised enough to do a beta release.

During this pre-release period, everyone who commits fixes of
significant bugs should also backport them to the 1.16 branch, if that
branch is affected. This might be a nuisance, but I don't think it's
unreasonable. It's in line with the way most other open source
projects work, and we had a similar period before the release of 1.15.

At this stage, you do not need to ask for approval to backport
something to 1.16.

This is not the time to merge all your unreviewed experimental work
into trunk. I'd like the merges to be done progressively, in priority
order, so that our reviewers can keep up with them. That way, we can
limit the amount of unstable code in HEAD, and keep trunk usable.

I'm open to suggestions about priority, but I think the simpler
branches (platonides, conrad) should be done before the more complex
branches (SkinSystemRewrite, parser-work).

-- Tim Starling


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]