[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wikipedia-l
Subject:    Re: [Wikipedia-l] Fund-raising suggestion
From:       "maru dubshinki" <marudubshinki () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-04-19 20:17:47
Message-ID: f5238c30604191317p2af4a8ccgd7c1f2bbce9dff48 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 4/18/06, Ian Tresman <it@knowledge.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm just saying that I would; and I guess that it doesn't matter if
> the advocate knows who the sponsor is, as it doesn't matter if an
> administrator or arbitrator knows who brings a regular case to their attention.
>
> I just feel that my time can be better spend editing articles, rather
> than having spent 80% of my time arguing over them.
>
> And it can't hurt to try it out?
>
> Regards,
> Ian Tresman

Sure it could. These things have a tendency to live on. How long ago
was the Seigenthaler affair, and how often do we still hear about it?
There are still people who think we banned anonymous editting entirely
because of that.

~maru
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]