[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wikipedia-l
Subject:    [Wikipedia-l] Re: incidently, talking about big principles...
From:       Anthere <anthere9 () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2005-03-30 21:46:29
Message-ID: 424B1E35.9010405 () yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]



Henry Tan-Tenn a écrit:
> Anthere ti 2005/3/29 EP 10:48 sia-kong:
> 
>> incidently
>>
>> These days, when you navigate quietly on the smaller
>> wikipedias, this is what you see
>>
>> http://ia.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFrontispicio&diff=0&oldid=13653
> 
> 
> Ant,
> 
> I navigate actively on a couple smaller Wikipedias, and I do not see 
> such abuse, be it unreverted vandalism, tolerance for proven copyviol, 
> or generally editing in bad faith.  So I would not imply such 
> occurrences are a rule.

Well, it happened many many many times in the past weeks on several pedias.

>> I thought I was working for a project trying to gather
>> free content so as to make free knowledge available ?
>>
>> So why are we using copyrighted pictures ?
> 
> 
> en: has countless fair use images, which are copyrighted.
> 
> Or have I misunderstood?  Do correct me if so.
> 
> ~~~~

Well, so do many other projects, but does the english wikipedia not 
mentions the image is kept because considered to be under fair use ?

When I worked with Alex756 on the policy of fair use images on fr (about 
2 years ago ?), I remember we set a list of cases for which an image 
could be said to be fair use.

I do not really see how this image could be said fair use in that sense. 
It seems to belong to another category I do not know.



_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]