[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wikien-l
Subject:    Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikimedia Board Elections
From:       "Richard Holton" <richholton () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-09-19 3:05:53
Message-ID: 4a37983b0609182005j32cc72e7n324b51a59cfb057b () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 9/18/06, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/18/06, Death Phoenix <originaldeathphoenix@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I voted for three people who I felt would be the best and
> most-qualified:
> > there is one who I think is the most qualified, and two who are about
> equal.
> > I wonder if I am doing my first choice user a disservice by voting for
> the
> > other two, and instead just vote for the one who I think is the clear
> > frontrunner.
>
> Based on the counts in the previous elections a huge number of people
> only supported one... In my discussions with people I found that many
> that supported only one in the election actually thought that multiple
> would have done an okay job, but either didn't understand or didn't
> feel comfortable with the approval voting process.


I'm one of those who are not familiar with this voting process. When I
looked at the candidates, there were a few I did not want to win, a couple
that I thought would be ok,  one that I favored, and a whole bunch that I
had no opinion on. So I voted for the one I favored and the couple I thought
would be ok.

Does that seem like a sensible approach?

(Really wanting to be educated...)

-Rich
[[W:en:User:Rholton]]
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]