[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wikien-l
Subject:    Re: [WikiEN-l] "refactoring" signatures
From:       "Andrew Gray" <shimgray () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-06-15 18:14:14
Message-ID: f3fedb0d0606151114r4aa00247xee0c3ed78a620c82 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 15/06/06, Ilmari Karonen <nospam@vyznev.net> wrote:
> Delirium wrote:
> >
> > That sounds like an argument for making "hard" links where both titles
> > are equally authoritative---i.e. "traveling" and "travelling" are both
> > top-level titles, but in fact are the same page.
> >
> > The current solution, making them different pages, is IMO much worse
> > than favoring one or the other, since it requires people to basically
> > copy/paste definitions across multiple pages, and make sure changes stay
> > in sync.  Look, for example, at "traveling" versus "travelling", which
> > currently actually have wildly different content despite being the same
> > word with a minor variation in spelling (this was the first example I
> > checked).
>
> I do wonder why they don't simply redirect both to [[traveling,
> travelling]].  Of course, I'm not an active wiktionarian, so I wouldn't
> know.  It sounds so obvious that it's probably a perennial proposal.

But *which one would go first*?

(I'll bet you people would fight over that, too.)

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]