[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wikien-l
Subject:    Re: [WikiEN-l] I can't have links to online articles I've written on
From:       Phroziac <phroziac () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-09-29 3:10:21
Message-ID: dd5435b70509282010698bd60b () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (text/plain)]

AH. That makes sense. Well, I can see that being a decent allegation
in article space, but I think a few links on his userpage won't matter
a whole lot. Additionally, it might not be such a great idea to add
links to something you run or wrote on an article, especially after
being accused of such a thing. I have added a link or two on wikipedia
to a wiki I run, but I've done  it so people can find the information
there. And others have added links to it too, some of them I've never
seen edit on my wiki. So, they must think it's useful too. There's
probably a link to it on three or four articles on wikipedia, and it's
still difficult to find on Google without specifically entering it's
name. I would have no problem if someone accused me of SEO linking,
and I would stop adding them. (Not that I have in a very long time..)

My suggestion is to give up the fight over the external links. It's a
big thing to get a link from wikipedia, and only a handful of sites
get onto any article. If it's really a good site, someone will revert
it back in eventually, hopefully.

I did look at your sprinkler page, and it was interesting. I barely
read anything and learned things.

On 9/28/05, Fastfission <fastfission@gmail.com> wrote:
> The comment Taxman used when removing them the first time was that
> they were "SEO links", which I presume means "Search Engine
> Optimization" -- i.e., he's (allegedly) trying to piggyback his page's
> own pagerank onto Wikipedia's high pagerank.
>
> I'm not sure there's any reason why people can't do that on their user
> pages, anyway, especially when it is something like "the writings of
> so and so" and not "BUY CANADIAN PHARMA HERE" or something like that.
> But anyway, that's what I'm betting the reasoning was, right or wrong.
>
> FF
>
>
> On 9/28/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Have you asked Taxman and Jmabel why they removed the links and blocked you?
> > They probably know their own reasoning best.
> >
> > --Mgm
> >
> > On 9/26/05, Brandon Hansen <buhansen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've been involved in a dispute with Taxman and others about posting any
> > > links to articles on the OmniNerd domain. I have been blocked twice
> > > concerning the issue and finally agreed with Taxman to follow his OmniNerd
> > > gag order, meaning I can't even suggest an OmniNerd article be listed in a
> > > WP article as an external link - no matter how the suggestion is worded.
> > >
> > > After my block expired, I made some significant edits to WP pages (not
> > > OmniNerd related) and also decided to put some effort into my user page
> > > (Uriah923). I noticed that other users - even an admin, Jmabel - included
> > > links to writings they had online. I did the same. Taxman then erased the
> > > links and blocked me again because the articles I've written are on
> > > OmniNerd.
> > >
> > > If Taxman and others don't want OmniNerd mentioned in WP articles because it
> > > is not "worthy", so be it. But, preventing me from listing the articles I've
> > > written on my own user page is going too far. The articles listed there do
> > > not have to be worthy of an encyclopedia article reference, or even of an
> > > external link - they are just listed because I wrote them. Having the links
> > > on my page might affect the PR of the articles, but if this alone is enough
> > > to erase them then any external link on anyone else's user page needs to be
> > > deleted also - and we all know that's just silly.
> > >
> > > So, I hope someone who reads this will be able to look at the case and
> > > recognize the abuse. My recent edits (since the gag-order agreement) have
> > > been constructive and I plan on doing many more of them. I see nothing wrong
> > > with having links to external articles I've personally written on my user
> > > page as I do so.
> > >
> > > -Brandon (Uriah923)
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > > WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]