[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wekalist
Subject:    Re: [Wekalist] efficiency of neural network implementation
From:       "Aldebaro Klautau" <aklautau () ucsd ! edu>
Date:       2002-01-17 21:38:48
[Download RAW message or body]

Don,

Sure, please send me what you wrote and I promise I will not bug you if I
get into troubles ! :)
Thanks a lot.

Aldebaro

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Willis" <DonW%FORGE@forge.com.au>
To: "Aldebaro Klautau" <aklautau@ucsd.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Wekalist] efficiency of neural network implementation


>
> I interfaced weka with another neural net package about 8 months ago.
> Unfortunately I no longer have internet access at home, and I won't be at
> work again until monday. (3 full days from now) and I don't have it on me.
> I can't remember the name of the package, but it's that big java one that
> people on the weka list were recommending before weka had neural nets.
> Would you like me to email it to you on monday?  It's only to an old
> version of weka.  I can't guarantee how useful it will be to you since I
> wrote it so long ago that I've forgotten all the details of it, but what
> have you got to lose?
>
> Don Willis
>
> Software Engineer
> Forge Research Pty Ltd
> Suite 116, Bay 9, Locomotive Workshop
> Australian Technology Park, Cornwallis Street
> Eveleigh NSW 1430 Australia
> Phone: +61 2 9209 4504   Fax: +61 2 9209 4172
> www.forge.com.au
>
> **********************************************************************
> This message contains privileged and confidential
> information intended only for the use of the addressee
> named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of
> this message you must not disseminate, copy or take
> any action in reliance on it.  If you have received this
> message in error please notify the sender immediately.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> individual sender, except where the sender specifically
> states them to be the views of another (including
> a Body Corporate).
> ***********************************************************************
>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]