[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       webkit-unassigned
Subject:    [Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 42912] Consider using
From:       bugzilla-daemon () webkit ! org
Date:       2011-06-30 23:42:33
Message-ID: 20110630234233.0E638711CB0 () lists ! macosforge ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42912





--- Comment #1 from James Robinson <jamesr@chromium.org>  2011-06-30 16:42:32 PST ---
I think we should do this.  We recently received a report from a chromium extension \
developer who was loading the data from a series of files via XHR and accessing the \
data as an ArrayBuffer via responseType="arraybuffer".  Even though only one \
ArrayBuffer is reachable through javascript at any given time, the page quickly \
exhausts available RAM since there aren't enough allocations within javascript memory \
to trigger a GC.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
webkit-unassigned mailing list
webkit-unassigned@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-unassigned


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]