[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       vtkusers
Subject:    Re: [vtkusers] How to store a binary image skeleton as a tree or graph?
From:       matheus_viana <vianamp () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-07-27 19:26:58
Message-ID: 1343417218826-5714964.post () n5 ! nabble ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Roman,

I think I got your point.

My current approach to deal with my skeleton in vtk is actually store
the graph as a iGraph structure, while the voxels (paths linking nodes)
are stored as lines in a PolyData structure. It is pretty easy to keep
both structures synchronized and you can enjoy the best of both
libraries, i.e. VTK for visualization and iGraph for your graph
calculations.

Please, let me know in the case you have any additional doubts.

Best,
Matheus Viana
Postdoctoral Research Employee
Developmental and Cell Biology
University of California Irvine



--
View this message in context: \
http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/How-to-store-a-binary-image-skeleton-as-a-tree-or-graph-tp5714939p5714964.html
 Sent from the VTK - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at \
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: \
http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]