[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       vtkusers
Subject:    [vtkusers] Version differences related with opacity
From:       <basalt76 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-12-24 5:56:25
Message-ID: AANLkTikOKoe8BWWODHmKEDGv+HDecAd+jx2TZ9TPjQ1m () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Dear Sir/Madam,

I created a isosurface using vtkMarchingContourFilter, and put opacity under
1.0.
The image looks abnormal in vtk 5.2.1.

But if I use vtk 5.6.0, it gets normal.

Do you know any differences related with this phenomenon* *between these two
version ?

Even though I used depth peeling or depth sorting in vtk 5.2.1, it didn't
get better.

I attached two images in vkt 5.2.1 and vtk 5.6.0.

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div>Dear Sir/Madam,</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>I created a isosurface using vtkMarchingContourFilter, and=A0put opaci=
ty under 1.0.</div>
<div>The image looks abnormal in vtk 5.2.1.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>But if=A0I use vtk 5.6.0, it gets normal.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>Do you know any differences related with this phenomenon<em> </em>betw=
een these two version ?</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>Even though I used depth peeling or depth sorting in vtk 5.2.1, it did=
n&#39;t get better.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>I attached two images in vkt 5.2.1 and vtk 5.6.0.</div>

--000e0cd5178e892305049821a59d--
["before_depthSorting.JPG" (image/jpeg)]
["VTK5-6.JPG" (image/jpeg)]

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]