[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: vocal
Subject: RE: [Vocal] BYE from the callee
From: Solo <solo () Dialpad ! com>
Date: 2001-06-29 1:27:41
Message-ID: DF49A3EC4130D411AC1600508B608DDF025D2559 () DIALPAD-EX2
[Download RAW message or body]
So, it shouldn't work like this? When can I find the code to associate the
call legs?
Hyeonkuk Jeong
-----Original Message-----
From: Chok Lam [mailto:chok@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 5:31 PM
To: Solo
Cc: vocal@vovida.org
Subject: Re: [Vocal] BYE from the callee
It looks like we need to associate a call leg (level 1)
with the persistent TCP connection.
At 08:06 PM 6/27/2001 -0700, Solo wrote:
X <--TCP--> Y <--UDP--> Z
We got INVITE from the Proxy server X using persistent TCP connection to ms
Y.
UDP messages such as 100, 180 and 200 from the gateway Z to ms Y went to the
proxy server X using the persistent TCP connection.
But when Z built a BYE message to send to Y (and eventually to X) using UDP,
that message went to X from Y using UDP instead of the persistent TCP
connection.
I've also tried to change the setting of Y to use TCP all the time, but Y
didn't use the persistent TCP connection which X created, but it created
another new TCP connection to X to send the BYE message.
Is this a standard rule?
Hyeonkuk Jeong
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=390502701-29062001><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>So, it shouldn't
work like this? When can I find the code to associate the call
legs?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=390502701-29062001><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=390502701-29062001><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>Hyeonkuk
Jeong</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Chok Lam
[mailto:chok@cisco.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, June 28, 2001 5:31
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Solo<BR><B>Cc:</B> vocal@vovida.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[Vocal] BYE from the callee<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>It looks like we need to
associate a call leg (level 1)<BR>with the persistent TCP
connection.<BR><BR>At 08:06 PM 6/27/2001 -0700, Solo wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite" cite><FONT size=2>X <--TCP--> Y
<--UDP--> Z</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT size=2>We got INVITE from the
Proxy server X using persistent TCP connection to ms Y.</FONT><BR><FONT
size=2>UDP messages such as 100, 180 and 200 from the gateway Z to ms Y went
to the proxy server X using the persistent TCP
connection.</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT size=2>But when Z built a BYE message
to send to Y (and eventually to X) using UDP, that message went to X from Y
using UDP instead of the persistent TCP
connection.</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT size=2>I've also tried to change the
setting of Y to use TCP all the time, but Y didn't use the persistent TCP
connection which X created, but it created another new TCP connection to X
to send the BYE message.</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT size=2>Is this a standard
rule?</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT size=2>Hyeonkuk
Jeong</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic