[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       vim-dev
Subject:    Re: Stable Vim version 7.1 has been released
From:       Bram Moolenaar <Bram () moolenaar ! net>
Date:       2007-05-15 9:56:39
Message-ID: 200705150956.l4F9udsd043279 () moolenaar ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


Francois Pinard wrote:

> [Bram Moolenar]
> 
> >Hmm, in my POV a rule like:
> 
> >	target: one two three
> 
> >means that "one", "two" and "three" are build in sequence, not at the
> >same time.  I suppose adding the "-jN" argument changes the semantics of
> >the Makefile, and that causes it to break.
> 
> In fact, so far that I know (and everything I know is debatable! :-), 
> the "in sequence" is not part of the semantic of Makefiles, and should 
> never be relied upon.  Of course, if you experiment with various "make" 
> implementations, you may observe that dependencies are usually build in 
> sequence, but this should be seen as an accident, and not as a proof.

So how do I tell make that I want to build three targets in sequence
then?  For generice make, not GNU make.

-- 
Birthdays are healthy.  The more you have them, the longer you live.

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@Moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\        download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]