[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       vim
Subject:    Re: Bug in nested sub-replace-special ?
From:       Hari Krishna Dara <hari_vim () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2004-03-25 20:43:58
Message-ID: 20040325204358.42724.qmail () web20812 ! mail ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 8:38pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:

>
> Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
>
> > I tried to use |sub-replace-special| in a function that itself is called
> > from another such usage. I observed that the inner usage for some reason
> > looses speciality and gets used like a regular string. Here is a simple
> > example:
>
> That's right, this cannot be done recursively:
>

Thanks for the clarification. A note in the docs would help others in
the future (or, is there one that I am missing?).

Hari

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]