[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       veritas-bu
Subject:    RE: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging Sanity Check
From:       "Geyer, Gregory" <Gregory.Geyer () avnet ! com>
Date:       2005-08-29 22:05:45
Message-ID: F0BCA06A24E6804186FECD4E77390C1C02BFEF1A () USCHD00MX11USR
[Download RAW message or body]

1.) There doesn't seem to be any job stats. How do you get drive speed
stats? *we are going to eval aptare, so maybe i can get stats from that.

      -No answer for you there.  I have a script that checks for how
much room is actually available, but no speeds and feeds.
 
2.) It appears that the data isn't removed from the Disk Stage. When
does the data get removed when doing a manual relocation? 
      - It is removed when there isn't enough room for new images -
FIFO.  The advantage to this is restores from disk don't have to wait
for tape mounts, positioning etc.  Disadvantage is sometimes its hard to
tell how much space is really there.

3.) It appears that only one tape drive gets used. I guess i'll have to
split the other jobs to another disk stage to get both drives working?
       - You are correct.
 
4.) Does 5.1 do a better job than 5.0 when it comes to the issues listed
above? 
   - nope.
 
 

________________________________

From: veritas-bu-admin@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Karl.Rossing@Federated.CA
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Veritas List
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging Sanity Check



Hi, 

We are currently running netbackup 5.0MP5. We have two LTO2 drives that
accept one stream each. We don't want to multiplex. 

I'd like to use Disk Staging  to speed up the backup. 

There are a couple of things i noticed when doing a manual relocation. 
1.) There doesn't seem to be any job stats. How do you get drive speed
stats? *we are going to eval aptare, so maybe i can get stats from that.

2.) It appears that the data isn't removed from the Disk Stage. When
does the data get removed when doing a manual relocation? 
3.) It appears that only one tape drive gets used. I guess i'll have to
split the other jobs to another disk stage to get both drives working?
4.) Does 5.1 do a better job than 5.0 when it comes to the issues listed
above? 

Thanks 
Karl

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Courier New" size=2><FONT face=Arial>1.) 
There doesn't seem to be any job stats. How do you get drive speed stats? *we 
are going to eval aptare, so maybe i can get stats from that.</FONT><FONT 
face="Times New Roman" size=3>&nbsp;<BR></FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN 
class=460560222-29082005>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -No answer for you 
there.&nbsp; I have a script that checks for how much room is actually 
available, but no speeds and feeds.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><FONT 
color=#000000><FONT face=sans-serif size=2></FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><FONT 
color=#000000><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>2.) It appears that the data isn't 
removed from the Disk Stage. When does the data get removed when doing a manual 
relocation?</FONT></FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3> 
</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
class=460560222-29082005>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; - It is removed when 
there isn't enough room for new images - FIFO.&nbsp; The advantage to this is 
restores from disk don't have to wait for tape mounts, positioning etc.&nbsp; 
Disadvantage is sometimes its hard to tell how much space is really 
there.</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><FONT 
face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3></DIV><FONT face="Courier New" 
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><BR></FONT><FONT color=#000000><FONT face=sans-serif>3.) 
It appears that only one tape drive gets used. I guess i'll have to split the 
other jobs to another disk stage to get both drives working?</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000000><SPAN 
class=460560222-29082005>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;- You are 
correct.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000><FONT><FONT color=#0000ff></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left>4.) Does 5.1 do a better job than 5.0 when it comes to 
the issues listed above?</FONT>&nbsp;</FONT><BR><SPAN 
class=460560222-29082005>&nbsp;&nbsp; - nope.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=460560222-29082005></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN 
class=460560222-29082005></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> veritas-bu-admin@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] <B>On Behalf Of 
</B>Karl.Rossing@Federated.CA<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 29, 2005 2:42 
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Veritas List<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging 
Sanity Check<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Hi,</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT 
face=sans-serif size=2>We are currently running netbackup 5.0MP5. We have two 
LTO2 drives that accept one stream each. We don't want to multiplex.</FONT> 
<BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>I'd like to use Disk Staging &nbsp;to speed 
up the backup.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>There are a couple of 
things i noticed when doing a manual relocation.</FONT> <BR><FONT 
face=sans-serif size=2>1.) There doesn't seem to be any job stats. How do you 
get drive speed stats? *we are going to eval aptare, so maybe i can get stats 
from that.</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>2.) It appears that the data 
isn't removed from the Disk Stage. When does the data get removed when doing a 
manual relocation?</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>3.) It appears that 
only one tape drive gets used. I guess i'll have to split the other jobs to 
another disk stage to get both drives working?<BR>4.) Does 5.1 do a better job 
than 5.0 when it comes to the issues listed above?</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT 
face=sans-serif size=2>Thanks</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif 
size=2>Karl</FONT></BODY></HTML>

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic