[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       velocity-dev
Subject:    Help -Unsubscribe me !
From:       APBHIDAY () UP ! COM
Date:       2003-01-24 20:15:02
[Download RAW message or body]


Does the unsubscribe facility for this email list not work? I have sent
scores of mails to
<mailto:velocity-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
and I am still a member of this mailing list.

I would not be working on Velocity any longer hence I might not need the
help of this mailing list.
Thanks for all the tips that I got so far though.
Adit


                                                                                      \
                
                      "Nathan Bubna"                                                  \
                
                      <nathan@esha.com>        To:       "Velocity Developers List" \
                <velocity-dev@jakarta.apache.org>, "Claude         
                                                Brisson" <claude@savoirweb.com>       \
                
                      01/24/03 02:12 PM        cc:                                    \
                
                      Please respond to        Subject:  Re: [PATCH] Map Support \
                (Syntax)                                              
                      "Velocity                                                       \
                
                      Developers List"                                                \
                
                                                                                      \
                
                                                                                      \





Claude said:
> There is another case we should consider : empty maps...
> 
> We need to make a difference between an empty map and an empty array !

heh.  you've got a point there.

> So some of the proposed syntaxes can't make it. The external enclosing
characters cannot be braces.
> 
> What are we left with ? After re-reading all the thread, I would retain
the following one :
> 
> { "a" = "b" , $c = $d }

i'd still prefer the ':' to '=' for my long-aforementioned reason (reusing
chars in a syntax lowers readability), but i'll settle for '=' if it will
help end the debate. :)

Nathan Bubna
nathan@esha.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:velocity-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:velocity-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:velocity-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:velocity-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]