[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       vchkpw
Subject:    Re: [vchkpw] deleting domains and dir_control
From:       Matt Brookings <matt () inter7 ! com>
Date:       2010-01-19 15:05:46
Message-ID: 4B55CA4A.9010204 () inter7 ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Mussulis wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> Thanks for the quick reply.
> 
>> Yes, it was meant to work this way. If you're running a newer version of
>> vpopmail, this entry will be re-used by a new domain.
> 
> Do you mean in the newer versions of vpopmail, newly added domains reuse
> the same entry?

Yep.  It's called the 'backfill patch'.

> Also, is there any documentation anywhere about "dir_control" works?
> From what I understand it's to do with hashing, am I right? But what
> exactly? For example I would like to understand how "dom_507" relates to
> test65.com.
> 
> Also is there anyway to manage "dir_control", if say the table grows too
> large, like a purging command? Should this be a concern?

You can find answers to all these questions by searching vchkpw archives.
The short answer is: No, you shouldn't worry about it
- --
/*
    Matt Brookings <matt@inter7.com>       GnuPG Key FAE0672C
    Software developer                     Systems technician
    Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.     (815)776-9465
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAktVykoACgkQIwet2/rgZyzZEQCfQhKCCx7wt9nTnzhso6BADoiz
LJUAoIg69rDxpZdQMsPXPNgy/1VaPdEh
=NLnK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]