[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: vchkpw
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities
From: Dave Goodrich <ldg () tls ! net>
Date: 2005-03-16 20:59:31
Message-ID: 42389E33.8060407 () tls ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> At 19.21 16/03/2005, you wrote:
>
>> tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
>>
>>> At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good morning,
>>>>
>>>> I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I
>>>> have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The
>>>> addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message. The
>>>> user in question is recently getting rejections. Here is a sample of
>>>> the qmail-smtp log.
>>>>
>>>> 2005-03-15 17:06:06.731444500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from
>>>> <npugh@c21xxxxxrealtors.com::> remote
>>>> <SUPPORT4:wls-41-226-196-65.tls.net:65.196.226.41> rcpt
>>>> <janetm@c21xxxxx.com> : not existing recipient
>>>>
>>>> 2005-03-16 08:37:28.526532500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from
>>>> <ldg@xxxxxtls.net::> remote
>>>> <[192.168.1.101]:64-184-8-148.bb.hrtc.net:64.184.8.148> rcpt
>>>> <janetm@c21xxxxx.com> : found existing recipient
>>>
>>>
>>> You should enable CHKUSER_RCPT_FORMAT and see if there are any
>>> strange characters (invisible in log) that make the address unusable
>>> (you have rcpt not existing when you could have INVALID FORMAT)
>>
>>
>> I can certainly do that. But I am confused, if I did't enable
>> CHKUSER_RCPT_FORMAT shouldn't the address work as it did before? Or is
>> there some level of format checking going on by default?
>
>
> Despite of CHKUSER_RCPT_FORMAT define, chkuser calls some routines to
> check for rcpt existence, and may be that address "my(invisible
> char)address@domain.com" is not found and logged immediately as "not
> existing rcpt".
>
> Ciao,
>
> Tonino
I removed that from the issue, the addresses are correct. If the user
sends a single email everything is fine. The message that is failing has
over 100 rcpt to addresses. Of course, _one_ email address is incorrect,
so the entire connection is rejected.
I should have caught that in the logs, it's been a very long week.
Thanks,
DAve
--
Dave Goodrich
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic