[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: varnish-dev
Subject: Re: Time to retire client.identify?
From: Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi () varni ! sh>
Date: 2015-07-03 15:15:02
Message-ID: CABoVN9BTTFdsLz1E4LLBFyEAN304wSQzaAqQfA4duVGFum6P-Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Federico Schwindt <fgsch@lodoss.net> wrote:
>
> One of the things Dag pointed about this is that if you want to hash based on the \
> client IP address you will need to do "" + client.ip. This is a valid concern \
> although the only situation I can think of where client.identity will be missed.
> There are a few options:
>
> 1. Use "" + client.ip. Somewhat ugly but will do the job.
-1
> 2. Do automatic conversion for arguments when the expected type is STRING or \
> STRING_LIST. See diff below. We do this already in a number of places but not for \
> arguments.
+1
> 3. Stash it in the req.http space. e.g.
>
> set req.http.session = client.ip;
> set req.backend_hint = hash.backend(req.http.session);
> #unset req.http.session;
-1
Sounds like a useless extra step, compared to option 2
> 4. Change the hash director to use client.identity again. e.g. drop the STRING_LIST \
> and use client.identity.
No, the 4.x hash director is a combination of 3.0 hash and client directors.
> 5. Do nothing.
-1
> As things are in master, client.identity lost it's place and it's more like a \
> scratch space or throw away variable and feels like a special case but YMMV.
> Any opinions?
>
> f.-
>
> diff --git a/lib/libvcc/vcc_expr.c b/lib/libvcc/vcc_expr.c
> index b9c6531..4019fec 100644
> --- a/lib/libvcc/vcc_expr.c
> +++ b/lib/libvcc/vcc_expr.c
> @@ -609,6 +609,9 @@ vcc_do_arg(struct vcc *tl, struct func_arg *fa)
> } else {
> vcc_expr0(tl, &e2, fa->type);
> ERRCHK(tl);
> + if (e2->fmt != fa->type &&
> + (fa->type == STRING || fa->type == STRING_LIST))
> + vcc_expr_tostring(tl, &e2, fa->type);
> if (e2->fmt != fa->type) {
> VSB_printf(tl->sb, "Wrong argument type.");
> VSB_printf(tl->sb, " Expected %s.",
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Martin Blix Grydeland <martin@varnish-software.com> \
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, this is OBE now.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 1 July 2015 at 15:58, Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi@varni.sh> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Federico Schwindt <fgsch@lodoss.net> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The hash director needs a string now so this no longer needed.
> > > >
> > > > Opinions?
> > >
> > > Agreed
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > varnish-dev mailing list
> > > varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
> > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Blix Grydeland
> > Senior Developer | Varnish Software AS
> > Mobile: +47 992 74 756
> > We Make Websites Fly!
>
>
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic