[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       uwsgi
Subject:    [uWSGI] Virtual hosts
From:       dantti12 () gmail ! com (Daniel Nicoletti)
Date:       2014-03-14 20:59:15
Message-ID: CACo8zOeOYJe5ThNM1yxCh-u5KEgemwGxjvFJHbY_8xKAEniHjQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks, I'll take a look then :)

2014-03-14 7:54 GMT-03:00 Guido Berhoerster <guido+uwsgi at berhoerster.name>:
> * Daniel Nicoletti <dantti12-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> [2014-03-14 00:45]:
>> I have googled a bit, asked on irc and looked up on the docs, still I have
>> not found if it's possible or not to setup uswgi to deal with virtual host
>> setups.
>> I ask this because if I run uswgi without ngnix siege report much more
>> requests per seconds plus when there are more than 150 simultaneous
>> connections nginx fail them.
>>
>> So is it possible to get rid of it?
>
> Yes, it is possible. The most flexible approach is to use the routing
> system (in particular route-host) in order to handle/manipulate
> requests (e.g. set the docroot, direct to a plugin) based on the
> hostname.
> --
> Guido Berhoerster
> _______________________________________________
> uWSGI mailing list
> uWSGI at lists.unbit.it
> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi



-- 
Daniel Nicoletti

KDE Developer - http://dantti.wordpress.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]