[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       userlinux-discuss
Subject:    Re: [Discuss] ul-directory
From:       Steve Milner <userlinux () gnulinux ! net>
Date:       2004-10-19 21:33:50
Message-ID: 1098221630.22045.1.camel () arc
[Download RAW message or body]

Great to hear there are no objections. I should have these packages
finished, personally tested and uploaded in the next few days.

As always, I will make an anouncement just after they pop into the
repository.

Cheers,
Steve Milner


On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 17:20, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> 	Not always silence mean that nothing is happening.
> 	In the last days i've been playing with ldap, nfsv4, heimdal and MIT
> kerberos and bind. More or less i have everything  working properly and
> integrated but some parts need a lot of love. In the next days, i will
> present a white paper here about what we can do and some minor ideas
> about how to do it. But before start discuss it, i would like to hear
> all of you about all this technologies and what we can get of them.
> 
> 	The scenario, if nobody disagree, will be the next:
> 
> 	Heimdal kerberos (ldap backend) + ldap (nis replace) + bind for DNS +
> NFSv4 with kerberos security
> 
> 	Openslp can be added to but i'm new to this technology so if anybody
> wants to tell us their advantages is really welcome.
> 
> 
> HEIMDAL
> =======
> 	Debian packages don't have ldap backend enabled by default. It can be
> added easily. I've been working with it and no problem have appear. I'll
> upload then to someplace if everybody agree.
> 
> LDAP
> ====
> 	Openldap 2.2 is necesary to use the smbk5pwd autoupdate plugin.
> Backport of it to 2.1 is not posible due to some internal changes. Can
> anyone take a look to this issue?
> 	We have to decide how to manage with master/slave replication
> (incremental? sync? async? how often?) backup politics and recuperations
> of disasters...
> 
> BIND
> ====
> 	Nothing to mention
> 
> NFSv4
> =====
> 	CITI patches works ideal... but the last version only compiles against
> MIT kerberos. If everything goes properly i will be providing patches
> and debian packages for heimdal kerberos by the end of this week.
> 
> 	Once that everything is decided and packaged the next step is to
> provide a way to make it really easy to deploy. For the beginning
> command tools are enough (anybody has experience with redhat libuser
> libraries?).
> 
> Any comments, ideas, whatever is really welcomed.
> 
> 	Ghe Rivero
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.userlinux.com
> http://lists.userlinux.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> List administrator: bruce@perens.com 510-526-1165
> Perens LLC / 1563 Solano Ave. / PMB 349 / Berkeley CA 94707 / USA
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.userlinux.com
http://lists.userlinux.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
List administrator: bruce@perens.com 510-526-1165
Perens LLC / 1563 Solano Ave. / PMB 349 / Berkeley CA 94707 / USA

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]