[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       user-mode-linux-devel
Subject:    [uml-devel] Your "host" scheduler for UML and CKRM
From:       Blaisorblade <blaisorblade () yahoo ! it>
Date:       2005-07-28 15:51:14
Message-ID: 200507281751.16894.blaisorblade () yahoo ! it
[Download RAW message or body]

You talked about the usage of the host scheduler for correct resource sharing 
between UMLs (i.e. an UML in TT/SKAS0 mode should not get more time for each 
process it has).

Well, I think that the CKRM project has done exactly something which would be 
useful for this purpose, it's already working, they're actively maintaining 
it and it may be merged soon (at least, it seems they're trying to do this).

Yes, with that project it's the host admin which must define the UML cpu share 
(at least I guess, but this may prove false), but that sounds reasonable... 
what do you think?
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]