[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       uddi4j-general
Subject:    [Uddi4j-general] Re:Possible bug ?? (Anirudh Shridhar)
From:       Benny Joseph <benny_mca () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2001-09-08 7:30:34
[Download RAW message or body]

--- uddi4j-general-request@www-126.ibm.com wrote:
> Send Uddi4j-general mailing list submissions to
> 	uddi4j-general@www-124.ibm.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/uddi4j-general
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	uddi4j-general-request@www-124.ibm.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	uddi4j-general-admin@www-124.ibm.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Uddi4j-general digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Possible bug ?? (Anirudh Shridhar)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:12:42 +0530
> From: "Anirudh Shridhar"
> <anirudh_shridhar@mindtree.com>
> To: <uddi4j-general@www-126.southbury.usf.ibm.com>,
> <dmelgar@us.ibm.com>,
>    <hately@us.ibm.com>
> Subject: [Uddi4j-general] Possible bug ??
> 
> Hi,
>   I have been using the UDDI4j API and would like to
> know if this is a bug in
> the API.
> The uddiProxy. find_business(java.lang.String name,
> FindQualifiers
> findQualifiers, int maxRows) 
>  method allows one to set the upper limit on the
> search and 0 for a limitless
> search as per the API documentation (maxRows).
> However setting 0 for a limitless search imposes a
> max limit of 100 .
> 
> Could you please tell me if this is a bug , if not
> then maybe the
> documentation needs to change
> or have i got it all wrong !!!.
> 
> 
> thanx & regards,
> Anirudh



Anirudh,

   According to the original API specification of
UDDI, In the event of a large number of matches, the
Operator site will truncate the result set.(Limit as
determined by each Operator Site).If this occurs, the
businessList will contain the truncated attribute with
the value “true”. So this is the behaviour, and it is
not a bug. You can make your selection criteria more
specific, to get the result you are exactly looking
for.

with Regards,
Benny Joseph.








> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Uddi4j-general mailing list
> Uddi4j-general@www-124.ibm.com
>
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/uddi4j-general
> 
> 
> End of Uddi4j-general Digest


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]