[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ubuntu-devel
Subject: Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 06/29/2010
From: brad.figg () canonical ! com (Brad Figg)
Date: 2010-06-29 19:16:15
Message-ID: 4C2A467F.7070900 () canonical ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
= Meeting Minutes =
[[http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/29/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt|IRC Log of the \
meeting.]]
[[http://voices.canonical.com/kernelteam|Meeting minutes.]]
== Agenda ==
[[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting#Tues, 29 Jun, 2010|20100629 Meeting \
Agenda]]
=== Open action: manjo to send a firewire patch with test info ===
> > manjo ||I believe pgraner tested this with kino and dvgrab and reported it to \
> > work.||
> > manjo ||I had submitted a bzr patch making the switch to ubuntu kernel mailing \
> > list,||
> > manjo ||waiting for tgardner or Keybuk to pick this up.||
> > tgardner ||hmm, I think we're still awaiting some test results||
> > Keybuk ||hmm? I don't do kernel stuff||
> > manjo ||tgardner, test results from ?||
> > tgardner ||Keybuk, its just a matter of swizzling some blacklists||
> > tgardner ||manjo, results from pgraner et al||
> > Keybuk ||ah, the old kansas city shuffle||
> > manjo ||tgardner, ok||
> > tgardner ||how about Luke's audio supprt changes?||
> > tgardner ||wasn't there an app that needed updating?||
> > manjo ||he was going to upgrade some of the audio packages||
> > manjo ||and he volunteered to do it||
> > tgardner ||manjo, has he done so?||
> > manjo ||tgardner, I will check with him again today||
> > tgardner ||manjo, once we have a synopsis of resul;ts, then I'll make the \
> > blacklist changes||
> > manjo ||tgardner, ack||
=== Open action: JFo to put out a CFT on new firewire stack ===
No status, JFo on vacation
=== Release Metrics ===
No status, JFo on vacation
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-apparmor ===
Synced latest upstreaming version of AA into Maverick. Marc Deslauriers already hit \
[[https://launchpad.net/bugs/599450|Bug #599450]] which testing missed. I am looking \
at it and it should be a quick fix.
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-firewire-stack ===
Covered in the open action item.
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-misc ===
No status, apw on vacation
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-new-kernel-on-lts ===
The Lucid LTS backport kernel from Maverick continues to track the Maverick kernel.
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-pv-ops-ec2-kernel ===
No change. I just started looking at this again and will have a new test kernel \
today
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-tracing-support ===
Nothing new, development work is done, should be removed from meeting schedule
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-ubuntu-delta-review ===
All Alpha2 work items are complete. Nothing new to report.
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-union-mounts ===
No status, apw on vacation
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bug-handling ===
No status, JFo on vacation
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-upstart ===
No status, apw on vacation
=== Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bios-test-automation ===
Changes to Firmware Test Suite this week:
* 7 Additional tests:
* maxfreq: check CPU freq scaling max frequency against CPU max freq.
* cstates: measure C states across CPUs and check activity when loaded
* WMI: inspect DSDT for WMIs and dump out WMI methods and events (for hotkeys).
* lid: interactive lid event detection test.
* Other improvements + fixes:
* klog scanning: use pcre rather than glibc regex.
* Improved progress feedback (-p, --show-progress).
* mtrr: check for MTRR config of VGA regions by BIOS.
* mttr: fix prefetchable region detection bug
* Add batch or interactive modes of testing.
* Include 800+ example klog errors to test against.
=== Status: Maverick ===
We uploaded a last minute linux-2.6.35-6.8 Alpha2 kernel on Sunday to resolve \
[[https://launchpad.net/bugs/597904|Bug 597904]] which was a blocker for building \
Alpha2 arm images. We will essentially be uploading a 0-day Alpha2 kernel, \
linux-2.6.35-6.9, to resolve [[https://launchpad.net/bugs/588861|Bug 588861]]. I've \
been given the green light to upload it late Wed. We currently have it uploaded to \
our kernel-ppa as an interim solution.
All of our team's Alpha2 work items are complete, so good job everyone. Alpha 3 is \
Thurs Aug 5th which is a little over a month away. Please review the list of work \
items for Alpha 3:
=== ARM Status ===
* Marvel (mvl-dove):
* Nothing new this week.
* Freescale (fsl-imx51):
* Nothing new this week.
* Texas Instruments (ti-omap):
* In Maverick, cooloney prepared a branch which includes some ASoC audio and \
other fixes for git pull.
* Bugs:
* cooloney went through the omap bug list, located \
[[https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap|here]]. Closed a bug \
to won't fix. Nothing new on other bugs.
=== Security & bugfix kernels - Karmic/Jaunty/Intrepid/Hardy/Others ===
* Dapper: 2.6.15-55.84 (security)
* Hardy: 2.6.24-28.70 (security)
2.6.24-28.71 (proposed)[11] 0 / 1 verifications done
* Jaunty: 2.6.28-19.61 (security)
* Karmic: 2.6.31-22.60 (security)
2.6.31-22.61 (waiting for approval)
- mvl-dove 2.6.31-214.28 (security)
2.6.31-214.29 (waiting for approval)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-112.28 (security)
2.6.31-112.29 (waiting for approval)
- ec2 2.6.31-307.15 (security)
2.6.31-307.16 (waiting for approval)
* Lucid: 2.6.32-22.36 (security)
2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[18] 14/39 verifications done
- LBM 2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[15] 3/ 3 verifications done
- mvl-dove 2.6.32-205.18 (security)
2.6.32-206.19 (proposed)[11] 13/41 verifications done (+ 1)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-608.14 (security)
2.6.31-608.15 (proposed)[11] 4/ 8 verifications done (+ 2)
- ti-omap 2.6.33-501.7 (security)
2.6.33-502.8 (proposed)[11] 0/ 4 verifications done
- qcm-msm 2.6.31-802.4 (security)
2.6.31-802.5 (proposed)[11] 1/ 5 verifications done
- ec2 2.6.32-306.11 (security)
2.6.32-307.12 (proposed)[11] 12/38 verifications done
* No feedback for ec2 boot tests (jjohanson?)
* All requested fsl-imx51 tests done.
* One requested mvl-dove verification done. Two to go (ericm?):
* [[BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576257| Launchpad bug 576257 in \
linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Maverick) "[dove] BSP update for LSP 5.1.1" \
[Undecided,Triaged]]]
* [[BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591249| Launchpad bug 591249 in \
linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Maverick) "[dove] BSP update for 5.2.1" \
[Undecided,Triaged]]]
* No requested ti-omap verification done (mpoirier?). Still open:
* [[BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584920| Launchpad bug 584920 in \
linux-ti-omap (Ubuntu Maverick) "netinstall fails, it has no network driver for \
moschip" [Medium,Fix committed]]]
* [[BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566238| Launchpad bug 566238 in \
linux-ti-omap (Ubuntu Lucid) "wlan0 "Interface doesn't support scanning." -- \
CONFIG_CFG80211_WEXT is not set" [Undecided,Fix committed]]]
It seems Martin was relatively happy with the current state so Lucid might move to \
updates at some point in the near future
=== Incoming Bugs and Regressions ===
No status, JFo on vacation
=== Incoming Bugs: Bug day report ===
No status, JFo on vacation
=== Open Discussion or Questions ===
> > abogani2 ||I would want only inform you that I placed -lowlatency and -realtime \
> > kernel on Zinc and in my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/ppa) for \
> > review. Ever if anyone have time and chance to do it. ;-)||
> > kamal ||regarding bug 594837 ...||
> > ubottu ||Launchpad bug 594837 in linux (Ubuntu) "Lucid SRU: Intel Core i3/i5/i7 \
> > hang on resume from suspend (SCI_EN)" [High,Confirmed] \
> > https://launchpad.net/bugs/594837||
> > kamal ||still no response to the patch I submitted to stable at kernel.org 14 \
> > days ago:||
> > kamal ||[PATCH] ACPI: Unconditionally set SCI_EN on resume||
> > kamal ||should we continue to wait, or move forward with a Lucid SRU, or \
> > something else?||
> > smb ||kamal, Greg seems to have re-surfaced recently||
> > smb ||kamal, But you might re-ask||
> > maks_ ||stable was on vacation.||
> > kamal ||maybe I'll give it another week then, thanks.||
> > lag ||I'd like to request that the ARM Status item is brought forward i.e. \
> > placed nearer the top of the agenda. Otherwise; if the meeting goes on longer \
> > than 45-60mins I will be unable to present the item as I have to leave imminently \
> > for 'other
things'. :)||
> > bjf ||lag, i have no problem with that||
> > bjf ||lag, i'll make it so||
> > lag ||I don't want to tread on anyone's toes||
> > bjf ||lag, it was an arbitrary decision on my part, i can change it||
> > lag ||Great, thanks||
--
Brad Figg brad.figg at canonical.com http://www.canonical.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic