[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       twsocket
Subject:    RE: [twsocket] HTTPCli ,inherited Get,Post etc
From:       "Wilfried Mestdagh" <wilfried () mestdagh ! biz>
Date:       2002-03-28 20:20:33
[Download RAW message or body]

Ted,

Maybe until now it was not needed by anyone ? But maybe not nececary to make them
all virutal. Tell us what exacly you wants and wy not make some methods virtual
in future releases ?

rgds, Wilfried

> -----Original Message-----
> From: twsocket-admin@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-admin@elists.org]On
> Behalf Of Ted Tøraasen
> Sent: donderdag 28 maart 2002 5:33
> To: twsocket@elists.org
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTPCli ,inherited Get,Post etc
>
>
> Why not virtual;
> In Httpprot.pas ( HTTPCli) why find the following
>
>         procedure   Get;       { Synchronous blocking Get        }
>         procedure   Post;      { Synchronous blocking Post       }
>         procedure   Head;      { Synchronous blocking Head       }
>         procedure   GetASync;  { Asynchronous, non-blocking Get  }
>         procedure   PostASync; { Asynchronous, non-blocking Post }
>         procedure   HeadASync; { Asynchronous, non-blocking Head }
>         procedure   Abort;
>
> Is there any reason they are not defined as virtual ?
>
> I'm a beginner with OOP , so i'm sorry if my question is stupide.
> But since i'm trying to add some code in a component based on HTTPCli
> It would be nice to know .
> If not maybe that could be included in the future versions ?
>
>
> Best regards.
>
> Ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
>


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]