[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       twig-devel
Subject:    RE: [twig-devel] BUG (& fix?)
From:       "Greg Ross" <greg () darkphoton ! com>
Date:       2000-02-26 0:26:15
[Download RAW message or body]


	I belive that this has already been fixed in the cvs server...

								Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jkikpole@cdcsd.k12.ny.us [mailto:jkikpole@cdcsd.k12.ny.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 6:08 AM
> To: twig-devel@BALANCE.WIW.ORG
> Subject: [twig-devel] BUG (& fix?)
>
>
> Greg Ross <greg@darkphoton.com> said:
> > 	I've finished up a patched tree of TWIG for the oracle port and
> shipped it
> > off to Karl to test, if nothing major comes back I'd like to release
> 2.2.0
> > on Tuesday (not tommorow obviously) Feb. 29.
>
> 	I have a last-minute bug submission.  I think that I know how to
> solve it, but I'm uncertain of the most "correct" method of fixing it.  If
> a site is set to use personal groups (in config.inc.php3) it will list an
> extra "Unfiled" group at the top of the Groups pop-up menu.  This group
> does not equal the original Unfiled group, which is listed below the All
> group.
>
> 	The first Unfiled is represented by the gid "" and the second (and
> original) Unfiled group is represented by the gid "0".  This is because
> the TWIGGroupsSelect function (lib/groups/personal.groups.inc.php3) calls
> on TWIGGroupsArray and then sort()s the results.  (That's why the gid=""
> Unfiled ends up above the gid="0" Unfiled.)  The TWIGGroupsArray function
> is getting the gid="" group from the TWIGGroupsMembership function.  That
> function always returns a null string.
>
> 	Here's my thoughts on how to fix it, though I could be way off.
> It looks like TWIGGroupsMembership is irrelivant to the very idea of
> personal groups.  Why not remove the call to it from the TWIGGroupsArray
> function in the personal.groups.inc.php3 file?  On the other hand, I could
> understand wanting to leave the TWIGGroupsMembership function definition
> in the library for potential compatibility concerns.
>
> 	Does that sound right to you guys?  I'm only familiar with about
> 10% of the source code these days and wouldn't want to break anything just
> before a 2.2.0 release.  If it sounds good to you, just commit it to the
> CVS tree.
>
> 							Thanks,
> 							Jaime Kikpole
>
> P.S. - I would have sent this out hours ago, but for some as-of-yet
> unknown reason TWIG's compose system stopped working on both of my servers
> at work.  I fill in a compose screen and hit Send Now but it just keeps
> saying "Connect:  Host <hostname> contacted.  Waiting for reply." in the
> status bar.  Eventually it times out and gives me a "Document contains no
> data." error.  I've seen this before, but it only occured during fixed
> hours and on one of the servers.  At this point its been happening for the
> last 8 hours on both servers.  They use different IMAP server software,
> but netstat -f inet shows that there's a conection from localhost.#### to
> localhost.imap but no listing of a localhost.imap to localhost.####. (For
> each connection, if it connects to localhost, it should be listed as "To"
> and "From" connections.)  So my guess would be that its something in
> inetd, but SIGHUPping it doesn't help.  Anyone know what's going on?
>
> --
> Network Administrator
> Cairo-Durham Central School District
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]