[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tuscany-dev
Subject:    Fwd: next 1.x release
From:       ant elder <ant.elder () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-12-17 12:59:46
Message-ID: 71e1b5740912170459l586956e8rffe530b050e1ff4 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

The 1.x trunk build on Hudson is about sorted out now so how about
starting on the release - unless anyones any big work items they still
want to get done I'd like to take the release branch early next week
so we can slowly start getting it ready to release.

  ...ant

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: next 1.x release
To: user@tuscany.apache.org


We should be able to get a 1.x release out by Feburary, might be a bit
slow getting it started right now as people will be off over the end
of year break but it should January should be time to get it done.

  ...ant

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Phillips, Chad <Chad.Phillips@gdit.com> wrote:
> As far as a timeframe, we'd like to see a final release on or before 01-FEB-2010 if \
> possible.  Is that doable or is that too soon? 
> The only other thing that I'd want to see looked into before a 1.6 release would be \
> [1] which has to w/ the policy framework not working correctly.  The policy \
> framework is going to be a pretty critical selling point of using Tuscany in my \
> project and the current workaround for disabling a policy (step 3 in the issue \
> description) is not really a long term solution. 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3356
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ant elder [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 01:53
> To: user@tuscany.apache.org
> Subject: Re: next 1.x release
> 
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Chad
> > 
> > I was thinking the same. I suggest we start looking at an RC0 and see
> > what's changes are in there and what needs to be done to get a release
> > out. We can the move through the process of creating the release
> > itself.
> > 
> > Are there any things people want to get into 1.x before a 1.6 release?
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Simon
> > 
> 
> +1 on a release, i've not got particular items to get in but happy to
> help get it done if people need one.
> 
> Chad, can you give us an idea of what sort of timeframe would be good
> for you to get it done by?
> 
> ...ant
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]