[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tuscany-dev
Subject:    [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2469) Lightweight implementation of the
From:       "Raymond Feng (JIRA)" <dev () tuscany ! apache ! org>
Date:       2008-07-30 22:13:31
Message-ID: 160445648.1217456011721.JavaMail.jira () brutus
[Download RAW message or body]


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi \
n.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618530#action_12618530 ] 

Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2469:
---------------------------------------

Patch applied and enabled under r681221 along with the fix r681219. Thanks

> Lightweight implementation of the SCA default binding over the corba binding
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Key: TUSCANY-2469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2469
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Java SCA Misc Binding Extensions
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assignee: Raymond Feng
> Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
> 
> Attachments: sca-binding-corba-jira-2469-21-july.patch, \
> sca-binding-sdo-problem-jira-2469-30-july.patch 
> 
> I'd like to have an implementation of the SCA default binding over the corba \
> binding, as a lightweight alternate to the current SOAP/Axis2 based implementation. \
> This implementation should be as transparent to the application developer and \
> assembler as the current default binding implementation (i.e. not impose special \
> constraints on the service interfaces, or additional codegen or deployment or admin \
> steps). We should also make sure that it is able to flow instances of our main data \
> bindings (including JaxB and SDO). Having that would also allow us to verify that \
> the current SCA binding is easily pluggable / replaceable by others who decide to \
> integrate Tuscany but want to use a different prototol than SOAP inside their SCA \
> domain.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]