[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       turbine-user
Subject:    Re: Security database selection scheme does not seems to be	appropriate
From:       Frederic Gedin <frederic.gedin () Jaluna ! COM>
Date:       2003-05-22 12:45:38
[Download RAW message or body]



Bill wrote:

>Maybe I dont understand your dilemma entirely, but couldnt you very
>simply accomplish this by allowing the default database to be the
>security database and defining your datastore in a second schema file?  
>
Let's say that it seems more logical for me to say that the default 
database is the database which has a functional meaning regarding the 
application, the security database being only secondary.

In addition, by default Torque builds the default database (i.e the one 
which is named "${torque.project}-data.xml").  If I followed this line, 
I would rebuild the security database which is share by all applications.

I can take the system as it is and twist it to make it work properly for 
me.  However, I think that my problem can give some ideas for improving 
Turbine's usability regarding the configuration of the security model.


Frederic



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]