[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       turbine-torque-user
Subject:    RE: isForReferenceOnly() ? why
From:       "Alexandru Dovlecel" <alexandru.dovlecel () siemens ! com>
Date:       2004-03-26 9:14:11
Message-ID: 002901c41312$b390d910$7eeff2a3 () ro1cv02d
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Bogdan,

Is it the same problem that I have noticed when splitting one large database
in several -schema.xml files??? See msg:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=torque-user@db.apache.or
g&msgNo=3726

There might be several other problems when splitting one database over
several schema files. I have renounced for now on this approach. Just one
big schema file and using a plugin to easily navigate through the XML nodes.
:(((

Good luck,
Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bogdan Vatkov [mailto:bvatkov@globaltech-bg.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 11:09 AM
> To: TORQUE_LIST
> Subject: isForReferenceOnly() ? why
>
>
> Hello Guys,
>
> I were trying to split my large database schema into separate
> *-schema.xml files
> and the result is that if i have multiple schemas and of course
> relations cross the schemas
> I have miss-generated a few valuable methods inside generated
> OM classes
> example: (init and add relations)
>
>     /**
>      * Temporary storage of $collName to save a possible db hit in
>      * the event objects are add to the collection, but the
>      * complete collection is never requested.
>      */
>     protected void init${relCol}()
>
>     /**
>      * Method called to associate a $tblFK.JavaName object to this
> object
>      * through the $className foreign key attribute
>      *
>      * @param l $className
>      * @throws TorqueException
>      */
>     public void add${relColMs}($className l) throws TorqueException
>
> as long as they are controlled by the isForReferenceOnly()
> this way i lose a lot of the power of torque om classes.
>
> So why is this restriction of code generated based on the fact wheter
> the table is or is not a part of the same schema ?
> Could be this fixed somehow ? I tought I can remove conditions
> concerning the isForReference() issue..but i am not sure ..
> Am I worng/right ? Any clues?
>
> With best regards,
> Bogdan
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-help@db.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]